--with-blas/lapack being ignored

Ben Abbott bpabbott at mac.com
Tue Dec 4 22:10:59 CST 2007


On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:26 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:

> On  4-Dec-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> | Building under the Fink package manager for Mac OS X on Intel has  
> been
> | a problem recently.
> |
> | Today I noticed that configure doesn't appear to handle the lapack/
> | blas option properly.
> |
> | --------------------------------------
> | ./configure '--prefix=/sw'  '--infodir=${prefix}/share/info' '-- 
> mandir=
> | ${prefix}/share/man' '--libexecdir=${prefix}/lib' '-enable-shared'  
> '-
> | enable-dl' '--disable-static' '--build=i386-apple-darwin' '--with-
> | blas=/sw/lib/libatlas.a' '--with-lapack=/sw/lib/libatlas.a'
> | 'build_alias=i386-apple-darwin' 'CFLAGS=-O2' 'LDFLAGS=-L/sw/lib'
> | 'CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include' 'CXXFLAGS=-O2' 'F77=/sw/bin/g95' 'FFLAGS=- 
> O2 -
> | funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -malign-double -msse2' --cache-
> | file=/dev/null --srcdir=.
>
> Why all these options?  --enable-shared, --enable-dl, --disable-static
> are all defaults.  Are you sure -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer
> -malign-double -msse2 really make sense and are helpful for your
> system?
>
> jwe


opps, I missed that question on my earlier reply. No I have no reason  
to be using those options, except that the g95 manual mentions that  
"[...] typical options are -funroll-loops, -fomit-frame-pointer, - 
malign-double and -msse2".

I thought I'd give it a quick try to see if there was any effect on  
the kernel panics (during "make check").

Ben


More information about the Bug-octave mailing list