octave segfault under AIX/shared

[G..]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> This makes no sense to me.  The oct-hist.cc file already includes
> file-ops.h, which provides declarations for these functions.  There
> should be no need to include redundant definitions for them in
> oct-hist.cc itself.
> 

Yes, it shouldn't make a difference, but in fact it does. At this point,
what more could I do?

G.

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/octave-segfault-under-AIX-shared-tf4886987.html#a14193331
Sent from the Octave - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.