--with-blas/lapack being ignored

[John W. Eaton]

On  6-Dec-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:

| On Thursday, December 06, 2007, at 01:35PM, "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:
| 
| >
| >As I recall, the argument is void* instead of struct tm* to avoid
| >exposing that in the octave_base_tm interface.
| >
| >Line 307 is
| >
| >    tm_zone = t->tm_zone;
| >
| >There is no call to strlen here, so I don't see how that happens.
| >Does struct tm on your system actually have a tm_zone field?  If not,
| >then why is HAVE_STRUCT_TM_TM_ZONE defined?  The check for this is
| >performed by the autoconf macro AC_STRUCT_TIMEZONE.
| >
| >jwe
| >
| 
| Checking my last  build output, the configuration process includes the following.
| 
| ------------------
| checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
| checking for struct tm.tm_zone... yes
| ------------------

Yes, but the question is, did the test somehow get it wrong?  I don't
see how it could, but I guess it is possible.

jwe