--with-blas/lapack being ignored

[John W. Eaton]

On  7-Dec-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:

| 
| On Dec 7, 2007, at 4:38 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
| 
| > On  7-Dec-2007, Ben Abbott wrote:
| >
| > | forgive me if this is less than useful, but I bailed on ddd and  
| > decided to run gdb instead. Once I've stopped on line 307 ...
| > |
| > | (gdb) display t->tm_zone
| > | 2: t->tm_zone = 0x0
| > | (gdb) display t
| > | 3: t = (tm *) 0xbfffa4e8
| >
| > Try (p is short for print)
| >
| >  p t->tm_zone
| >  p *t
| >
| > Does the following patch help?
| >
| 
| With the patch applied the execution jumps from line 307 to 313.

That's expected, since t->tm_zone is 0.

Apparently you are compiling with HAVE_STRUCT_TM_TM_ZONE defined.

Was HAVE_STRPTIME also defined, so that everything is the same as it
was originally (when the crash was happening) except that you've now
applied the patch?

jwe