sparse indexing issue

[David Bateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 18-Dec-2007, David Bateman wrote:
>
> | Kim Hansen wrote:
> | > On 12/17/07, David Bateman <David.Bateman at motorola.com> wrote:
> | >   
> | >> Thomas Kasper wrote:
> | >>     
> | >>> Bug report for Octave 2.9.19+ configured for i686-pc-linux-gnu
> | >>>
> | >>> Description:
> | >>> -----------
> | >>> row and column reproduction via index operations do not seem
> | >>> to work properly for sparse matrices
> | >>>       
> | >
> | > I am not sure if this is the same or an other bug, but this is a
> | > little surprising:
> | > =============
> | > octave:1> sparse(42)([1 1])
> | > ans =
> | >
> | > Compressed Column Sparse (rows = 1, cols = 2, nnz = 2)
> | >
> | >   (1, 2) -> 42
> | >   (1, 2) -> 42
> | > =============
> | >
> | >   
> | Its the same bug.. I'm working on it, but its fighting back :-)
>
> How is this a bug?  I thought that was the expected behavior when
> indexing a 1x1 object with a matrix in Matlab.
>
> jwe
>
>   
Its a bug since both elements are indexed as (1,2)

D.


-- 
David Bateman                                David.Bateman at motorola.com
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary