qp() in Octave 3.0.0 returns result egregiously violating input constraints

[Joshua Redstone]

OK - I"ll get it in that form.  I think I may have lost a race with the
moderator and so you may see an old email come thru
with an attachment in a less usefull format.
Josh

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:32 PM, John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:

> On  4-Apr-2008, Joshua Redstone wrote:
>
> | Hi Gabriele,
> | Thanks for your resonse.  The problematic example involves 100
> variables.
> | What format would be most convenient for me to send it in?
> | I've set 'format long g' and printed out all the args to qp() that I
> use,
> | naming them as they are named in qp.m, and attached the result
> | to this email (gzipped).
>
> How about in a format that can be read by Octave, along with the
> command that you use to invoke the qp function?  Make it so that we
> can do
>
>  load somefile.dat
>  qp (?)
>
> where you tell us what ? should be so that we can reproduce the
> problem.
>
> Where do the numbers come from?  Is it possible to generate them with
> a script?
>
> Make it easy for us to reproduce the problem and we are more
> likely to help debug it...
>
> jwe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/attachments/20080404/99c6139c/attachment.html