Issue of deprecated warnings in 3.0.1b and 3.1.x

David Bateman David.Bateman at motorola.com
Wed Apr 9 08:27:46 CDT 2008


Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> --- David Bateman <David.Bateman at motorola.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> The warnings like
>>
>>     warning ("Octave:deprecated-function",
>>         ["is_list is obsolete and will be removed from a future\n",
>>                "version of Octave, please use islist instead"]);
>>
>> should instead be written as
>>
>>     warning ("Octave:deprecated-function",
>>         strcat("is_list is obsolete and will be removed from a future\n",
>>                "version of Octave, please use islist instead"));
>>
>> otherwise the warning is incorrectly printed. Do you want a patch?
>>
>> D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-octave mailing list
>> Bug-octave at octave.org
>> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/bug-octave
>>
>>     
>
> What is "3.0.1b" ? Is it a newer than "3.0.0" octave version which can be downloaded and built
> and has no failures in "make check" ?
>
> If it's the cases, what's the tarball URL ?
>
> Thanks,
>   Sergei.
>   
Its a pre-release test taball for a full 3.0.1 release.. A number of 
issues were found in the 3.0.1a test release and a 3.0.1b release was 
done.. URL is

http://jbrwww.che.wisc.edu/home/jwe/octave-3.0.1b.tar.bz2

D.




> /mail.yahoo.com 
>   



More information about the Bug-octave mailing list