Issue of deprecated warnings in 3.0.1b and 3.1.x
David Bateman
David.Bateman at motorola.com
Wed Apr 9 08:27:46 CDT 2008
Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> --- David Bateman <David.Bateman at motorola.com> wrote:
>
>
>> The warnings like
>>
>> warning ("Octave:deprecated-function",
>> ["is_list is obsolete and will be removed from a future\n",
>> "version of Octave, please use islist instead"]);
>>
>> should instead be written as
>>
>> warning ("Octave:deprecated-function",
>> strcat("is_list is obsolete and will be removed from a future\n",
>> "version of Octave, please use islist instead"));
>>
>> otherwise the warning is incorrectly printed. Do you want a patch?
>>
>> D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-octave mailing list
>> Bug-octave at octave.org
>> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/bug-octave
>>
>>
>
> What is "3.0.1b" ? Is it a newer than "3.0.0" octave version which can be downloaded and built
> and has no failures in "make check" ?
>
> If it's the cases, what's the tarball URL ?
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei.
>
Its a pre-release test taball for a full 3.0.1 release.. A number of
issues were found in the 3.0.1a test release and a 3.0.1b release was
done.. URL is
http://jbrwww.che.wisc.edu/home/jwe/octave-3.0.1b.tar.bz2
D.
> /mail.yahoo.com
>
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list