failed build with current mercurial sources
Ben Abbott
bpabbott at mac.com
Sat Mar 8 10:18:55 CST 2008
On Mar 8, 2008, at 5:08 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>
>> I have access to an older Fedora 4 system with gcc 4.0.2 - I'll try
>> to
>> compile Octave there and reproduce the segfault.
>>
> I compiled Octave on a Fedora 4 Linux box with gcc/gfortran 4.0.2, but
> the relevant qr test passes OK. Unless someone confirms the problem on
> a different platform, I'm inclined to attribute it to a bug in
> gfortran 4.0.1.
hmmm ... since I'm compiling with gfortran4.2.2, I assume our mean a
bug in gcc 4.0.1, or in gfortran 4.2.2?
There was quite a bit of discussion regarding fortran compilers and
lapack on the Mac during the month of December. I recall Thomas
Treichl, JWE, JF Mertens, and others being involved on various threads.
The discussion took place mainly on bug-octave, but in a few different
threads. Since Mertens does not frequent the list, I searched on him
and turned up a pair of threads.
http://www.nabble.com/forum/Search.jtp?forum=1895&local=y&query=jf+mertens+fortran
I also found
http://www.nabble.com/Solution-to-MacOSX-on-Intel--tc14206463.html#a14215121
http://www.nabble.com/octave-doesn%27t-build-DSO%27s-with--fPIC-tc14193717.html#a14195452
There were additional discussions on Fink's mail-list, but I don't
expect to find any additional information there.
For the moment, I'll try building (1) with no optimization and -fPIC,
and (2) with no explicit options at all.
I'm just shooting at superficial targets here, so if anyone has some
other ideas toss them up and I'll take a shot at them as well ;-)
Ben
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list