'whos' with incorrect fields

[John W. Eaton]

On 12-Mar-2008, dbateman wrote:

| Yes the information is available by other means, but using whos was
| convenient.. I'll miss it, but seems you've made up your mind..

Not necessarily.  I checked in the following patch.

jwe


-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: diffs
Url: https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/bug-octave/attachments/20080312/5caa41e0/attachment-0001.ksh