failed build with current mercurial sources

[Ben Abbott]

On Mar 19, 2008, at 8:23 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:

>
> --- Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mar 19, 2008, at 3:39 PM, John W. Eaton wrote:
>>
>>> On 19-Mar-2008, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>>
>>> | How might I force the lapack/blas from libcruft to be used?
>>>
>>> If you use the options
>>>
>>> --without-blas --without-lapack
>>>
>>> then Octave won't search for installed BLAS and LAPACK libraries and
>>> will instead use the reference BLAS and LAPACK library sources
>>> included with Octave.
>>>
>>> jwe
>>>
>>
>> oh oh, didn't work :-(
>>
>> ./configure '--prefix=/sw' 'FLIBS=/sw/lib/gcc4.3/lib/
>> libgfortran.dylib' 'F77=/sw/bin/gfortran' '--libexecdir=${prefix}/ 
>> lib'
>> 'CFLAGS=-g -O3' 'LDFLAGS=-g -L/sw/lib' 'CPPFLAGS=-I/sw/include'
>> 'CXXFLAGS=-g -O3' 'FFLAGS=-g -O3 -fbounds-check -ff2c' '--without- 
>> blas
>> --without-lapack'
>> configure: error: invalid package name: blas --without-lapack
>>
>> What did I do wrong?
>>
>> Ben
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bug-octave mailing list
>> Bug-octave at octave.org
>> https://www.cae.wisc.edu/mailman/listinfo/bug-octave
>>
>
> Why "'--without-blas  --without-lapack'" ? I mean, why both of them  
> in the same pair of single
> quotes rather than '--without-blas' '--without-lapack' ?
>
> Regards,
>  Sergei.

Thanks Sergei, I'm into the make phase.

Ben