Regression: Subfunctions not cleared upon function reload

[Moritz Borgmann]

>| | | Now if I comment out the testsubfun subfunction in testfun1.m and
>| | | save the file, Octave still gives exactly the same result. Instead,
>| | | it should bail out and complain that testsubfun is not defined. It
>| | | seems like subfunctions are not properly cleared from the symbol
>| | | table upon reload of a function.
>| |
>| | The following change seems to fix this problem.
>|
>| Never mind.  That change causes lots of test failures.  I think I'm
>| closer to understanding what is cuasing the problem, but that fix is
>| not the solution.
>
>OK.  Try this one instead.  It also seems to fix the problem that Ben
>Abbott reported.  I've checked it in to the public archive.

yes, this fixes the problem. Thanks!

-M