Bug in 3.0.1's betainc function (was Re: [OctDev] More than just an inconvenience Re: But in t_cdf: sporadic zero's when "no need")

[dbateman]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> 
> On 13-May-2008, David Bateman wrote:
> 
> | Then this is an issue with the underlying SLATEC function dbetai, the
> | only sensible way I see of fixing this is to replace it with the gsl
> | functions, and in that case lots of other functions in Octave should get
> | the same treatment.
> 
> I think this should be a goal for 3.2.
> 
> jwe
> 

By 3.2 do you mean in the current unstable release 3.1 that will become the
next stable release or after the next stable release?

D.


-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bug-in-3.0.1%27s-betainc-function-%28was-Re%3A--OctDev--More-than-just-an-inconvenience-Re%3A-But-in-t_cdf%3A-sporadic-zero%27s-when-%22no-need%22%29-tp17216669p17328449.html
Sent from the Octave - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.