speed of statistics.m
David Bateman
David.Bateman at motorola.com
Wed Oct 1 08:12:26 CDT 2008
Francesco Potorti` wrote:
>>> contrary to my expectations, statistics is much slower in Octave 3.1:
>>>
>>> octave3.0> t=cputime;statistics(1:35000);cputime-t
>>> ans = 0.26002
>>>
>>> octave3.1> t=cputime;statistics(1:35000);cputime-t
>>> ans = 1.6521
>>>
>> `statistics' computes a number of characteristics. Could you identify
>> which one of them is causing the slowdown?
>>
>
> Sorry, bad report :(
>
> It turns out that while the nan package does not significantly affect
> the speed of statistics() in 3.0, it severely slows them down in 3.1.
>
> In fact, without the nan package, 3.1 is much faster, as I expected by
> looking at the code.
>
Why the nan package should make things much slower is of course a
different bug report, and would be interesting to get to the bottom of.
D.
--
David Bateman David.Bateman at motorola.com
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list