Does sqp example work ?

[Ivan Sutoris]

So the algorithm is stuck at starting point, I see...  that would also
explain why iter = 1 and why I should read old threads more carefully
:)
Anyway, since development version is fixed, the bug will hopefully not
be present in future release. I'm not sure if there is any way to
manually correct sqp in 3.0.1, could anyone comment on that? If not,
then only solution for now is to compile Octave from mercurial
sources, I guess...

Ivan Sutoris

On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Stefan Eichenberger
<se_misc at hotmail.com> wrote:
> ... the bug being that I just get back x0 however I change x0 (as at top
> of the thread) Stefan
>
> Ivan Sutoris wrote:
>> I haven't been familiar with discussion from January, but since I also
>> use sqp(), I took a look: I'm using the same windows version (3.0.1)
>> and I confirm the bug (the bug being that returned result doesn't
>> comply with constraints g, right?). I get the same result also in
>> 3.0.2 MinGW version released recently. However, I got correct result
>> in version compiled from recent development sources (that is in Linux
>> though), so the problem seems to be fixed there.
>> Regards
>> Ivan Sutoris
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more!