'fltk_backend' missing?
Michael Goffioul
michael.goffioul at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 02:49:38 CST 2009
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Søren Hauberg <soren at hauberg.org> wrote:
> tor, 19 02 2009 kl. 08:38 +0000, skrev Michael Goffioul:
>> fltk_backend is an existing oct-file, but it doesn't define
>> any "fltk_backend" function.
>
> Ahh, I see. Could we then rename the oct-file such that its name
> corresponds to a function it provides?
Or simply define a fltk_backend function in the oct-file, that
woudl do nothing, except maybe printing some useful
documentation about the FLTK backend...
Michael.
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list