'fltk_backend' missing?
John W. Eaton
jwe at octave.org
Fri Feb 20 14:07:29 CST 2009
On 19-Feb-2009, Michael Goffioul wrote:
| On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:45 AM, Søren Hauberg <soren at hauberg.org> wrote:
| > tor, 19 02 2009 kl. 08:38 +0000, skrev Michael Goffioul:
| >> fltk_backend is an existing oct-file, but it doesn't define
| >> any "fltk_backend" function.
| >
| > Ahh, I see. Could we then rename the oct-file such that its name
| > corresponds to a function it provides?
|
| Or simply define a fltk_backend function in the oct-file, that
| woudl do nothing, except maybe printing some useful
| documentation about the FLTK backend...
I don't know what to put in the help for a function like this, but I'd
consider a patch. If you add fltk_backend, then it would be good to
add a similar function for the gnuplot backend (it can just be a .m
file)
jwe
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list