functionend ignored

[David Grundberg]

Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> I think it's the case when sloppy Matlab code should be fixed, i.e.
> the case of intentional bug-to-bug incompatibility with Matlab.
>
> What I've read so far looks very convoluted, and if the developers want
> to spend their effort, they better spend it implementing missing Matlab
> functionality (like nested functions).
>   

In order to be able to support nested functions, Octave need to be able 
to parse them. And that mail was me trying to figure out how to do just 
that.

> I mean that missing 'end'/'enfunction' should not just cause a warning, but
> be considered an error. It is really easy to add missing 'endfunction'.
>
>
> Regards,
>   Sergei.
>   

I think it is necessary to support missing ends, since it isn't by any 
means deprecated by Mathworks. They even have their examples written in 
that style.

Regards,
David