[OctDev] Function mean() fails with a complex matrix
Søren Hauberg
soren at hauberg.org
Thu Mar 5 09:45:00 CST 2009
tor, 05 03 2009 kl. 16:04 +0100, skrev Alois Schlögl:
> Or can You think of any reasonable problem, when mean should propagate
> the NaN's ? I can not. Consequently, there is no need to have both
> nanmean and mean.
I guess this depends on how you interpret NaN. I think it makes sense to
skip NA (not available) when computing mean values. But if NaN is the
result of some faulty calculation somewhere in your program, then it can
be nice to see the NaN's propagate. Otherwise you might never notice you
had a bug.
Søren
More information about the Bug-octave
mailing list