change to residue.m

[Doug Stewart]

Ben Abbott wrote:
> Doug Stewart and I invested some time and effort improving the 
> accuracy of the residue.m script when pole multiplicity exists.
>
> Doug's suggestion, which we've each invested several hours testing, 
> was to set the value of each unique pole to that average of the 
> multiple poles associated with it. The result has been found to be a 
> few orders of magnitude more accurate.
>
> To capture the improvement, the test scripts were also modified to be 
> more stringent.
>
> In the event, for those interested in verifying our work,  I've 
> attached the patch and ChangeLog.
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
I don't see any response to this  Email   from Dec 24th on the 
maintainers list.  Did it get implemented?
Doug Stewart