built-in variable i

Bart Vandewoestyne Bart.Vandewoestyne at telenet.be
Wed Aug 13 09:25:00 CDT 2008


On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:01:24AM -0400, John W. Eaton wrote:
>
> Why?  2.1.69 is obsolete and quite old.  It had some bugs, like this.
> Some were fixed.  2.9.12 is also obsolete and fairly old and had some
> bugs, some of which were fixed.  I'd recommend upgrading to the
> current stable version, 3.0.1.

John,

You're probably right... 2.1.69 *is* indeed quite old, but
unfortunataly some people I work with here at our department
are still running Debian 3.1 sarge... which has 2.1.69.  But
anyway, you're right, they should upgrade and forget about the
past ;-)

The reason I'm using 2.9.12 is because it is the version that is
in the package from my Ubuntu distribution (and I'm too lazy to
compile and install myself ;-)  For now, 2.9.12 seems to do just
fine for me, so i think i will only upgrade if i need features
from later versions.

Thanks,
Bart

-- 
	"Share what you know.  Learn what you don't."


More information about the Help-octave mailing list