is IMAGE_PATH irrelevant?
ChrisPaola
cpaola at umn.edu
Mon Aug 18 14:21:16 CDT 2008
Looking over past posts it appears there was talk of eliminating the
IMAGE_PATH as a separately specifiable variable and just using the current
file path for images as well. Was that actually done? I can't seem to read
images using imread from the directory specified by IMAGE_PATH; I get a
'cant find file' error unless I have the file path set to that directory. Am
I missing something or is IMAGE_PATH no longer being used?
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/is-IMAGE_PATH-irrelevant--tp19037895p19037895.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Help-octave
mailing list