is octave-3.0.4 production-worthy ?
Jaroslav Hajek
highegg at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 09:08:21 CDT 2009
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've built recently octave-3.0.4 using the same tools I used for
> octave-3.0.3, and after doing with it some simple things I have a feeling
> something is wrong, for example, max(max(matr)) produces different results
> on octave-3.0.4 and octave-3.0.3, and the latter results appear to be
> correct. The matr is a difference of two WAV files.
>
> Also, it may be that octave-3.0.3 is faster - my subjective feeling.
>
> This Email is not an official bug report - obviously, I need to provide
> the exact details, and maybe the problems were due to my mistakes, but I
> decided to ask.
>
> If octave-3.0.4 is really considered to be OK, I will recheck myself, and if
> the problems persist, I'll file the reports with full details.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei.
>
>
>
there is a known serious bug in octave 3.0.4 regarding loading ASCII
files - 3.0.5 is on the way (tarballs already made).
maybe this relates to some of your trouble. I'd be very skeptical
about the speed difference.
cheers
--
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz
More information about the Help-octave
mailing list