Solaris: patches to run-octave.in
Moritz Borgmann
octave at moriborg.de
Mon Dec 3 19:16:29 CST 2007
wouldn't it be easier to temporarily move your installed libraries
move out of the way, and then test run-octave?
The old version should work fine.
If you run the old version with LD_PRELOAD taken out, it should fail
because it doesn't find the libs.
My version should also run fine because LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
interpreted by the loader.
This looks like an easier test procedure to me.
Cheers,
Moritz
At 2:10 Uhr +0100 2007-12-04, David Bateman wrote:
>Moritz Borgmann wrote:
>>> In any case, I don't think we absolutely have to exec Octave in the
>>> script. David, would removing LD_PRELOAD and the exec fix the problem
>>> for you?
>>
>> To conclude the discussion, I propose the following patchset:
>>
>
>The problem is that issues only occurred for me when there was an API
>mismatch between the installed libraries and the ones in the build tree.
> I suppose we can artificially create this situation by changing the api
>version numbers between the installed libraries and those in the build
>tree and testing your patch.. I'll try to do that sometime this week to
>test this.
>
>D.
More information about the Octave-maintainers
mailing list