2.9.19??
Michael Goffioul
michael.goffioul at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 05:14:12 CST 2007
On 12/11/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > On 12/11/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > > Anyway Michael's gnuplot goes well, this is a trivial issue but I wonder why.
> >
> > Probably because the way pgnuplot and wgnuplot communicate together
> > is not suited for binary data.
>
> OK!
> I think that Michael's opnion is right.
>
> The original pgnuplot just send data
> in a byte unit wgnuplot windows by Win32 API.
>
> This seems to the gnuplot problem.
>
> I'll go to the gnuplot ML.
That's basically to avoid this kind of problems (and the one you also
tried to work around by adding a delay in pgnuplot.c) that I developed
a real console mode for gnuplot, with real pipes (I don't find the existing
pgnuplot solution very elegant).
I proposed a patch back in April this year (before the 4.2 release), but
the follow up is not very active. See
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1627936&group_id=2055&atid=302055
Michael.
More information about the Octave-maintainers
mailing list