3.0 when?

[John W. Eaton]

On 18-Dec-2007, Michael Goffioul wrote:

| On 12/18/07, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
| > Hello Benjamin
| >
| > Benjamin wrote
| > > I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core
| > > functions.
| > > Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first
| > > install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
| > >
| > > It would also allow easier use of a packaged editor with the mingw binaries.
| >
| > That's a good idea!!
| > I also vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core functions.
| 
| Why not also package octave-forge in the mingw binaries?

I think it would be best if the standalone Windows distributions were
essentially the same except for the choice of compiler.  Would it be
difficult to make that happen?

jwe