3.0 when?

Tatsuro MATSUOKA tmacchant at yahoo.co.jp
Wed Dec 19 17:28:07 CST 2007


Hello

Sorry I have just passed over your reply to Benjamin.

Thanks for your accepting Benjamin's proposal.

Tatsuro

--- "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:

> On 18-Dec-2007, Benjamin Lindner wrote:
> 
> | I would vote for moving edit.m from the forge package to octave core 
> | functions.
> | Argument is similar to the imread/imwrite topic. Why should I first 
> | install a package to be able to conveniently invoke an editor.
> 
> OK, I added edit.m to Octave because it is a single .m file, so moving
> it is easy.
> 
> I don't plan to move imread/imwrite to Octave until after 3.0 because
> they are more complex and involve library dependencies.
> 
> jwe
> 


--- "John W. Eaton" <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:

> On 20-Dec-2007, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> 
> | Is the proporsal from the Bejamin, which I agreed with, to be accepted or not?
> 
> Precisely which proposal is that?
> 
> jwe
> 


--------------------------------------
New Design Yahoo! JAPAN  2008/01/01
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/newdesign/


More information about the Octave-maintainers mailing list