succcessful to build octave-3.1.51 with full components on mingw

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA]

Hello

Thanks for Michael. 

I think it is better to move the octdev list for the discussion.

Regards

Tatsuro

--- Michael Goffioul <michael.goffioul at gmail.com> wrote:
> I guess you should discuss that with Benjamin. I was just proposing that
> you join forces to finalize a MinGW-based octave release.
> 
> Michael.
> 


*****************************
> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <tmacchant at yahoo.co.jp> wrote:
> > I think that it is preferrable to me to join with Benjamin.
> > However the strategies of making binary are quite different between my way and his one.
> >
> > My idea is the following:
> > I will stop to upgrade my octave-3.0.x on mingw any more.
> > Of course personally I will challege to build it when the new version source is released and
> > report results.  In the sense I will be a building tester of octave for mingw.
> > It is because programing skill of Bebjamin is much better than mine, he should be a official
> > maintainer of the mingw release.
> > Some knowledge of the octave-forge package supports, I perhaps have proceeding expreriences.
> > I am willing to provide the information to Benjamin.
> > In my mind, I would like to catch up with the latest development release of the octave.
> > For the 3.1 branch, I would like to challege to build them and release the binary on my web.
> >
> > I would like to hear some comments on this matter.
> 



--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/