"Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?

[Michael Goffioul]

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:08 PM, John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:
> I'd like to consider wrapping Octave's classes in a separate
> namespace.  I think we could do it for 3.2, but maybe there is some
> reason to avoid this change?  Does anyone have any strong objections
> to doing this?  Other comments?

When wrapping into an octave namespace, would you end up (for instance)
with octave::octave_value or with octave::value? More generally, do you
intend to keep the octave_ prefix?.

Michael.