"Octave" namespace for Octave C++ sources for 3.2?

[Michael Goffioul]

On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:51 PM, John W. Eaton <jwe at bevo.che.wisc.edu> wrote:
> | When wrapping into an octave namespace, would you end up (for instance)
> | with octave::octave_value or with octave::value? More generally, do you
> | intend to keep the octave_ prefix?.
>
> I'd like to eliminate some of them.  I'm not sure we have to remove
> all of them.  Even if we do remove some, I think we could use typedefs
> to keep the old names around, at least for some time (years, probably).

I'm just asking because I was thinking about the graphics code and
the possibility to remove some graphics_ prefixes as well. For instance,
turn graphics_backend class into octave::graphics::backend.

Michael.