arrayfun.m reworked

Thomas Treichl Thomas.Treichl at gmx.net
Thu Dec 4 03:25:11 CST 2008


David Bateman schrieb:
> Thomas Treichl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have finished reworking arrayfun - finally I decided to find the bug 
>> in arrayfun.m and not to send my arrayun.cc here. And thanks to David 
>> for having a look at the cellfun problems I have had ;)
> 
> It appears that this changeset slipped through the cracks. Sorry, even 
> though I made some bug fixes around this I fell back on the position 
> that John would approve or not this patch.

That is no problem. Thanks for applying it...

>> PS. I have created a similiar large testset for cellfun, should I 
>> prepare a patch for this or is this some kind of overshooting?
> No full coverage testing is a good goal to aim for. If you have tests 
> for cellfun, I'd say to send them.

A changeset for review is attached.

Regards,

   Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: cellfun.changeset
Url: https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/attachments/20081204/cda9546f/attachment.ksh 


More information about the Octave-maintainers mailing list