error compiling 3.0.x in ov-base-scalar.h (mingw32)

[Benjamin Lindner]

Hello,

I did a build of current 3.0.x HG sources for mingw32 and compilation 
fails with the error

mingw32-g++-4.3.0-dw2 -c -march=i686 -mtune=generic -I. 
-I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src -I.. -I../liboctave 
-I../src -I../libcruft/misc -I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x 
-I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/liboctave 
-I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src 
-I/octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/libcruft/misc 
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -mieee-fp -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -D_DLL -O2 
-Wall /octaveforge_mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/bitfcns.cc -o bitfcns.o
In file included from 
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-int.h:39,
                  from 
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-intx.h:36,
                  from 
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-uint64.h:38,
                  from 
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/bitfcns.cc:33:
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-scalar.h:93: 
error: 'octave_value octave_base_scalar<ST>::reshape(const dim_vector&) 
const' cannot be overloaded
d:/files/admin/octaveforge_svn/trunk/octave-forge/admin/Windows/mingw32/octave/octave-3.0.x/src/ov-base-scalar.h:90: 
error: with 'octave_value octave_base_scalar<ST>::reshape(const 
dim_vector&) const'

Looking into ov-base-scalar.h I see that there is indeed a method 
reshape(), but it's defined *twice*

<snip>
    octave_value reshape (const dim_vector& new_dims) const
        { return array_value ().reshape (new_dims); }

    octave_value reshape (const dim_vector& new_dims) const
        { return array_value ().reshape (new_dims); }
</snip>

and the changelog tells that the method reshape() was added indeed twice 
in rev 7619 and 7621

Is this intentional?

benjamin