[Changeset]: Re: Compilation problem: xacosh missing/typo?

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> With a fresh update of octave HG, I get a compilation error
> in liboctave, because of undefined reference of _xacosh_.
> Looking into libcruft/slatec-fn/xacosh.f, it appears the name
> of the subroutine is defined as "xsacosh". Is this a typo?
>
> Michael.
>
>   
Yes this is a typo when I was replacing double precision slatec
functions with single precision versions (ie xdacosh in this case) and
before I'd downloaded the new functions from netlib. The attached
changeset addresses this

D.


-- 
David Bateman                                David.Bateman at motorola.com
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: patch8238
Url: https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/attachments/20080616/e0e69b5d/attachment.ksh