New Function rectint.m

Bill Denney wsloand at gmail.com
Tue Mar 4 21:45:26 CST 2008


John W. Eaton wrote:
> On  2-Mar-2008, Bill Denney wrote:
>
> | I was feeling like doing something so I wrote the rectint.m function.  
> | Changelog is in the changeset.
>
> I applied this patch with a few style changes.  I also added a check
> to ensure that the arguments are 2-d arrays.  Is that OK?  As it is,
> your function silently ignores the additional dimensions.  Is that
> desirable behavior?
>
> Finally, I'll take this function since it seems to work, but perhaps
> there is a way to vectorize it and avoid the nested for loop and
> subfunction?
Hi John,

Checking for 2-d arrays is something that I missed, thanks for catching 
it.  I tried to think of a way to vectorize the calls, but I couldn't 
think of anything off the top of my head.  I will keep thinking about it.

Have a good day,

Bill


More information about the Octave-maintainers mailing list