New Function rectint.m

[Bill Denney]

John W. Eaton wrote:
> Finally, I'll take this function since it seems to work, but perhaps
> there is a way to vectorize it and avoid the nested for loop and
> subfunction?
>   
Hi John,

I updated it to be vectorized (and I think I caught a few bugs that are 
captured in the new tests).

Have a good day,

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: rectint.changeset
Url: https://www.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/attachments/20080308/9006e351/attachment.ksh