3.0.3 release candidate 2

[Michael Goffioul]

On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Benjamin Lindner <lindnerben at gmx.net> wrote:
> [...] and the one in bitcmp.m which is also
> already known. I thought I read on the list it had been fixed, apparently I
> missed something here.

You have to make sure that HAVE_ROUND is not defined,
because the round implementation in MinGW is not robust
for large numbers.

Michael.