classdef support for octave
David Bateman
David.Bateman at motorola.com
Thu Sep 4 04:31:28 CDT 2008
Michael Goffioul wrote:
> (OK, not many reactions so far. I guess it's low priority...)
>
> To answer myself, I think that the implementation should be
> more tightly coupled to the symbol table code of octave. I'll
> try to redesign the code that way (but it'll take some time as
> it requires jumping into the intrinsics of symtab.[h|cc]). At first
> sight, my first idea is to add a cls_info object to store class
> specific informations, managing dispatching and inheritance
> as well as class reloading.
>
> I'll see what comes out of this. Any help is of course welcome.
>
>
No comments not because of lack of interest but because my minds on
other things.. I think it would be great to have classdef support for
3.2 if its relatively easy to implement as you imply.
D.
--
David Bateman David.Bateman at motorola.com
Motorola Labs - Paris +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph)
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax)
The information contained in this communication has been classified as:
[x] General Business Information
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary
More information about the Octave-maintainers
mailing list