[OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

[Judd Storrs]

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:27 PM, John W. Eaton <jwe at octave.org> wrote:

> I don't see a statement saying that it is strictly GPLv2.  Yes, he
> says GPLv2, but he doesn't say that there is no possibility to use a
> later version if you wish.


I was going off of the COPYING file and his repeated specific demands to
comply with GPL version 2 in the linked conversation. If his intent was just
to demand generic GPL compliance, why would he specifically say "GPLv2"?

--judd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/attachments/20090420/8d8dd83d/attachment.html