[OctDev] No symbolic package in future (Windows/VC++) releases

[David Bateman]

Michael Goffioul wrote:
> Just for the record, looking at the answer here
>
> http://www.ginac.de/pipermail/cln-list/2009-April/000513.html
>
> this guy won't stop at GiNaC/CLN. And he claims this is still
> valid for GPLv3.
>
> Michael.
>
>   
 From the thread the CLN author states he contacted licensing at fsf.org.. 
Given his statements I doubt he asked a question is a sense that is to 
the benefit of a VC++/Octave release.. I'd still suggest contacting FSF 
for their position of distribution of the VC++ runtime binary installers 
on the basis of it being part of the compilation process.

D.


-- 
David Bateman                                dbateman at dbateman.org
35 rue Gambetta                              +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home)
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE            +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)