3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux

[Marco Atzeri]

--- Dom 22/2/09, Rafael Laboissiere  ha scritto:

> Da: Rafael Laboissiere 
> Oggetto: Re: 3.1.52 fails to build in hppa/linux
> A: maintainers at octave.org
> Data: Domenica 22 febbraio 2009, 21:19
> * Rafael Laboissiere  [2009-02-22
> 20:28]:
> 
> > * John W. Eaton  [2009-02-22
> 13:34]:
> > 
> > > On 22-Feb-2009, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > 
> > > | * Jaroslav Hajek 
> [2009-02-22 18:55]:
> > > | 
> > > | > I don't say it's impossible, but I
> do not see how it can actually be
> > > | > possible, unless int64_t is a typedef of
> double (which would really be
> > > | > weird).
> > > | 
> > > | Not even that causes a compilation error on my
> amd64 Debian system.
> > > 
> > > How is int64_t defined on the systems where the
> failure happens?
> > 
> > Tell me how I can discover that, please, and I will do
> it on the failing
> > architectures.
> 
> It is actually simple: I just ran cpp on a file containing
> "#include
> <stdint.h>".  Here are the results:
> 
> On amd64 ("good" architecture):
> 
>     typedef long int int64_t;
>     typedef unsigned long int uint64_t;
>     
> On mipsel ("bad" architecture):
> 
>     typedef long long int int64_t;
>     typedef unsigned long long int uint64_t;
> 
> -- 
> Rafael

on cygwin

typedef long long int64_t
typedef unsigned long long uint64_t

Regards
Marco



      Passa a Yahoo! Mail.

La webmail che ti offre GRATIS spazio illimitato, 
antispam e messenger integrato.
http://it.mail.yahoo.com/