3.0.4 RC3

[Bill Denney]

Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> Hello 
>
> The modification is not apropriate so that nchoosek.m test still cause an error.
>
> http://www-old.cae.wisc.edu/pipermail/octave-maintainers/2009-January/010175.html
> not -1e-14 but -1e-13, I think
Hi,

It's probably better to use eps() as the reference. For me, 100*eps ()
passes the test, but 1000*eps () is closer to 1e-13.

Have a good day,

Bill