new branch?

[Ben Abbott]

On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com> wrote:
>> John / Jaroslav,
>>
>> I see an unexpected branch in the sources at rev 9284. The branch  
>> is more
>> like a stub as it only contains two changesets. Both of them are  
>> mine.
>>
>> Revision: 9285
>> Branch: default
>> Author: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
>> Committer: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
>> Parent: 9284:d8becc6d0a18 (__scatter__.m: If the color spec is  
>> empty, set
>> using __next_line_color__.)
>>
>>    __gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change version for  
>> "x11_figure_position" from
>> ">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".
>>
>> Revision: 9284
>> Branch: default
>> Author: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
>> Committer: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
>> Parent: 9283:38ad8c99d6a2 (__gnuplot_get_var__.m: insert missing  
>> semicolon)
>> Child:  9285:692c5a6ab019 (__gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change  
>> version for
>> "x11_figure_position" from ">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".)
>>
>>    __scatter__.m: If the color spec is empty, set using  
>> __next_line_color__.
>>
>> I'm not very good with mercurial, and am only came across the  
>> problem when I
>> did "hg view".
>>
>> Do you see these changesets in your archive?
>>
>> Ben
>>
>
> No, I think neither of these is present, at least the IDs can't be
> found. Probably you pulled and forgot to merge or rebase (rebasing is
> preferred).
>
> regards

Ok. Thanks. I'll try to fix my end tomorrow and then push these changes.

Ben