new branch?

[Ben Abbott]

On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 3, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Jaroslav Hajek wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> John / Jaroslav,
>>>>
>>>> I see an unexpected branch in the sources at rev 9284. The branch  
>>>> is more
>>>> like a stub as it only contains two changesets. Both of them are  
>>>> mine.
>>>>
>>>> Revision: 9285
>>>> Branch: default
>>>> Author: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
>>>> Committer: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 21:46:43
>>>> Parent: 9284:d8becc6d0a18 (__scatter__.m: If the color spec is  
>>>> empty, set
>>>> using __next_line_color__.)
>>>>
>>>>   __gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change version for  
>>>> "x11_figure_position"
>>>> from
>>>> ">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".
>>>>
>>>> Revision: 9284
>>>> Branch: default
>>>> Author: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
>>>> Committer: Ben Abbott <bpabbott at mac.com>  2009-05-29 20:46:34
>>>> Parent: 9283:38ad8c99d6a2 (__gnuplot_get_var__.m: insert missing
>>>> semicolon)
>>>> Child:  9285:692c5a6ab019 (__gnuplot_has_feature__.m: Change  
>>>> version for
>>>> "x11_figure_position" from ">=4.3.0" to ">=4.2.5".)
>>>>
>>>>   __scatter__.m: If the color spec is empty, set using
>>>> __next_line_color__.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not very good with mercurial, and am only came across the  
>>>> problem
>>>> when I
>>>> did "hg view".
>>>>
>>>> Do you see these changesets in your archive?
>>>>
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>
>>> No, I think neither of these is present, at least the IDs can't be
>>> found. Probably you pulled and forgot to merge or rebase (rebasing  
>>> is
>>> preferred).
>>>
>>> regards
>>
>> Ok. Thanks. I'll try to fix my end tomorrow and then push these  
>> changes.
>>
>> Ben
>
> Are they worth getting into 3.2.0? I've set up Friday as the release
> day, and I want to avoid further delay if possible,
> but there's still time to make rc8 tomorrow. However, if you think
> they deserve testing, we better keep them for 3.2.1.
>
> cheers

These are both trivial changes. I doubt they'd cause any problems, so  
I'd recommend they be included.

I'll push them as soon as I can and you can judge what is appropriate.

Ben