desired features for gp backend?
Daniel J Sebald
daniel.sebald at ieee.org
Sun Jun 14 21:52:18 CDT 2009
Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Daniel J Sebald wrote:
>
>> Robert T. Short wrote:
>>
>>> As far as octave with gnuplot, I really liked the old gplot interface.
>>
>>
>> I liked it too.
>
>
> Dan, Robert,
>
> Was it just the interface that you liked, or some specific functionality?
Being able to send commands to gnuplot before doing a plot in order to modify gnuplot in ways not possible with the plot commands. The concept doesn't work so well anymore because plot() modifies a lot of things that one might want to set. However, as gnuplot evolves to retain data, it seems one could do this POST plot(). For example,
set(fig, 'postplot', 'set gnuplotfeature xyz; replot')
plot(x, y)
might have value.
It isn't that important at the moment. As Bob said, graphics is now pretty feature rich, plus gnuplot doesn't have the retained data working perfectly yet.
Dan
More information about the Octave-maintainers
mailing list