Problem compiling sparse-xdiv.cc (typename)
David Bateman
dbateman at dbateman.org
Sat May 9 17:06:45 CDT 2009
Michael Goffioul wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Jaroslav Hajek <highegg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> However, the code seems valid to me. I think that typename always
>> applies to the following qualified dependent name, regardless of any
>> operators following. So I suspect it's a MSVC++ bug. I think our
>> current (kind of unofficial) policy is that only the mainstream gcc
>> version is worth putting workarounds into Octave code itself (if the
>> code is otherwise OK).
>>
>
> Personally, I find that policy unfortunate, especially when you can
> get the same result with something that could work on more compilers.
> But I'm not the one who decides.
>
I thought the policy was more along the lines of the above except if the
workaround was minimal and harmless for other compilers then accept it
with a comment above the change.. That is of course if there was any
policy at all..
D,
--
David Bateman dbateman at dbateman.org
35 rue Gambetta +33 1 46 04 02 18 (Home)
92100 Boulogne-Billancourt FRANCE +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob)
More information about the Octave-maintainers
mailing list