3.2.0 release candidate 2

Carlo de Falco carlo.defalco at gmail.com
Tue May 26 06:22:25 CDT 2009


On 25 May 2009, at 19:02, octave-maintainers-request at octave.org wrote:

> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:01:10 +0200
> From: Jaroslav Hajek <highegg at gmail.com>
> Subject: 3.2.0 release candidate 2
> To: octave maintainers list <maintainers at octave.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<69d8d540905250401hf92635bs873eaa79c0e534a9 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> hi,
>
> the Octave 3.2.0 RC2 tarballs are available at
> http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~hajej2am/ulozna/octave/
>
> enjoy
>
> --  
> RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek
> computing expert & GNU Octave developer
> Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
> Prague, Czech Republic
> url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz

Jaroslav,

I see RC2 does not include the patch I proposed for pkg.m:

http://www.nabble.com/-Changeset--Let-%22pkg-describe%22-return-version-of-the-packages-td23692416.html

I understand that probably we are in feature-freeze stage before the  
release, but I'd still like to try to push for the inclusion of this  
change ;)

This is needed for the new octave-forge package release system, and  
given the current rate of octave releases if we need to wait for 3.4  
before we can put that system in place that might mean a long time.
Plus the change is so trivial I really doubt it could generate any  
regressions.

So do you think it would still be possible to apply that changeset?
Thanks,
c.




More information about the Octave-maintainers mailing list